Talk:Bruchsal Palace/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Mdob (talk · contribs) 18:59, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

GA criteria
:
 * (a)
 * (b) first two paragraphs (before the contents) are short and to the point. Mdob (talk) 19:50, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

:
 * (a)
 * (b)
 * (c)

:
 * (a)
 * (b)

. . : 6 small, non-intrusive images, including one panorama. Mdob (talk) 19:50, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

Hello! What is the status of this review? Doesn't look like any progress has been made in almost 2 months.-- Dom497 ( talk ) 01:33, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Second reviewer
I'll pick up this review, per a request on my talk page. I should be able to get to it in the next couple of days. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:27, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

That's all I can find; the article is in excellent shape. The sources look OK, though I see many of them are tourist guides rather than specialist publications: in case you are considering taking this to FAC, I would suggest looking at the German version of the article, which lists several sources that appear to cover the palace complex in detail in the "Literatur" section. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 10:10, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Not a requirement for GA, but it would be good to include an image of the palace ruins after World War II. I would think a fair use claim would work.
 * We have "Zick and Balthasar Neumann, the main designer of the corp de logis", but later "The main part of the building was designed by Baron Anselm von Grünstein": aren't these in conflict? You do say Balthasar took over as Chief Engineer and constructed the staircase, but that's not the same as saying he took over as designer.
 * It was created to resolve an architectural conundrum created by von Schönborn's late decision to add a mezzanine floor to the corp de logis: two uses of "created" in close succession; can we rephrase?
 * Just realized I had not pinged you. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 10:52, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I'll leave this another week, and will have to fail this if there's no response. I could fix the "created" point myself, but I think the question about Balthasar will require access to the source. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 12:09, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Mike Christie, unfortunately Prioryman's most recent Wikipedia edit was on March 27, so after so long an absence I rather doubt he's going to be replying to this review, especially since he was pinged on his talk page over two weeks ago. I think you're going to have to fail this. I apologize for not having checked his activity level before I asked you to take over the review. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:27, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I agree. Failing for lack of response to the issues raised.  Prioryman, if you return and fix these points and renominate, I'll be glad to give it a quick review. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 15:15, 16 June 2018 (UTC)