Talk:Bruegel (think tank)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Bruegel (institution). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130627063611/http://www.gotothinktank.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/2012_Global_Go_To_Think_Tank_Report_-_FINAL-1.28.13.pdf to http://www.gotothinktank.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/2012_Global_Go_To_Think_Tank_Report_-_FINAL-1.28.13.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:58, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bruegel (institution). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://www.bruegel.org/fileadmin/bruegel_files/About_page/Bruegel___8._RTF_Report_2013.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111203115702/http://www.bruegel.org/fileadmin/bruegel_files/About_page/Bruegel_review_task_force.pdf to http://www.bruegel.org/fileadmin/bruegel_files/About_page/Bruegel_review_task_force.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:39, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Not a neutral article
The entire article reads like a corporate presentation and bears all the hallmarks of either having been written by the organization itself or copied verbatim from the organization's presentation material. No assessment of it's work, no clear statement of its economic/political standpoint, and no critique of its influence in promoting its economic policies. Judging from the quoted sources, this can hardly qualify for a neutral POV 83.250.76.132 (talk) 04:00, 25 May 2023 (UTC)