Talk:Brugada syndrome/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Natureium (talk · contribs) 16:25, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

I've never done a GAN review before, so please let me know (politely) if I'm doing anything wrong.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Mechanism: heart racing -> rapid heart rate :✅ PeaBrainC (talk) 17:19, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * Suggested changes:
 * Lead: new mutation -> new genetic mutation :✅ PeaBrainC (talk) 20:59, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Causes: disturbed -> disrupted? :✅ PeaBrainC (talk) 20:59, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Don't know if " known as loss of function mutations." fits in the paragraph :✅ PeaBrainC (talk) 20:59, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Does the term "overlap syndrome" apply? The article on overlap syndrome only describes it in the context of autoimmune connective tissue disorders.:❌ Overlap syndrome is certainly a correct term to describe, for example, the phenotype of Brugada and Long QT 3 syndrome in the same patient, or Brugada and ARVC. I appreciate the current article for overlap syndrome doesn't explicitly mention this and I will try to add a paragraph to that article in due course PeaBrainC (talk) 20:59, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I have now amended the article on Overlap syndrome to better reflect that this term is used to refer to more than just autoimmune conditions. PeaBrainC (talk) 17:19, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
 * in SCN5A that reduced -> reduces :✅ PeaBrainC (talk) 20:59, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Diagnosis: link to ST elevation :✅ PeaBrainC (talk) 17:19, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Choose either Genetic testing or Causes/genetics to mention incomplete penetrance :✅ PeaBrainC (talk) 17:19, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
 * "occurring as a bystander" is unnecessary and somewhat confusing :✅ PeaBrainC (talk) 17:19, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Treatment: per WP:EL, external links do not belong in the body :✅ PeaBrainC (talk) 17:19, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
 * History: see in -> seen in :✅ PeaBrainC (talk) 17:19, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
 * lead to competing theories -> led to :✅ PeaBrainC (talk) 17:19, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * Sources # 9, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 25, 28, 39, 41, 42, are primary sources, but are mainly used for background information
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Hi, thanks for reviewing this article. It's only my 2nd GAN but to my inexperienced eyes looks like you've done a good job. I will get on with making the amendments you have suggested and mark them as done on this page as I go. It may take a few days - busy times in the real world! PeaBrainC (talk) 09:48, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Looks good! Congrats! Natureium (talk) 21:50, 12 July 2018 (UTC)