Talk:Bruno Lüdke

No references
No references, tag added.--FloNight 22:51, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Bias
The article seems heavily biased in favour of Lüdke's innocence.
 * But it is referenced, and prima facie entirely credible (it wasn't unusual for people executed by the Nazis to be innocent!), so I am going to remove the tag. Alex Middleton 10:32, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Controversies
oh cristo.. this is history, not a controversy

Death
According to the German wikipedia, his death is unclear. He may have died during an experiment, not execution. Saemikneu (talk) 13:12, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Bias and virtually no Citations
This whole article keeps talking about how he never really killed anyone and was innocent and leans toward that assumption while giving no credible sources whatsoever, it even calls him a "Victim of National Socialism in Germany", so much bias and so little sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:201:200:7AE0:902F:471B:FE2:5164 (talk) 06:46, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Calling a serial killer a “victim” because he was apprehended by the Nazis
Fucking sickening what Wikipedia has come to you sick fucks literally defend serial rapists & murderers in order to try to make a non existent political point. Absolutely fucking sickening. 142.117.72.105 (talk) 17:53, 13 January 2022 (UTC)