Talk:Brunswick Falls/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Praseodymium-141 (talk · contribs) 17:14, 12 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you!! Jake Jakubowski   (Talk)  17:43, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) Looks decent, but slightly short. I'll check these later. (Criteria marked are unassessed)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a. (reference section):
 * b. (citations to reliable sources):
 * c. (OR):
 * d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Pass/fail:

Comments

 * Ancient history#Indigenous peoples seems to be about Maine, not Brunswick Falls.
 * ✅ I took out the first paragraph and slightly reworded the second paragraph.
 * - should be lowercase.
 * ✅ of Boston ==> from Boston
 * ✅ of Boston ==> from Boston
 * ✅ of Boston ==> from Boston

Sorry, I ran out of time, that's all of the prose comments so far.  141 Pr  {contribs} 20:55, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

More:
 * - Sturgeon and Alewife should be lowercase.
 * - same thing.
 * Explain.
 * ✅ ==> are able to swim up the steps of the ladder.
 * Explain.
 * ✅ ==> are able to swim up the steps of the ladder.

There's all the prose comments.  141 Pr  {contribs} 06:43, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

More:


 * Is Publius Research reliable?
 * yes, as they cite their sources
 * Is energyjustice.net reliable?
 * yes, as they cite their sources
 * Is newspapers.com reliable?  141 Pr  {contribs} 21:03, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * yes, these are actual newspapers articles.

Couldn't find any more issues, so passing.  141 Pr  {contribs} 09:55, 19 June 2023 (UTC)