Talk:Brunswick Line

Rolling stock
I'm pretty sure 874/877 uses more than six cars. &mdash;Wrathchild (talk) 15:02, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Top Importance?
What is the rationalisation for this project being so important? 86.24.193.136 (talk) 13:09, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
 * It's not, I changed it to mid importance. Thanks, C628 (talk) 15:36, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Refactor and userfy
I'm a railfan, and found the Rolling Stock section confusing. It needs userfied to explain some of the differences the Trains buff author apparently is knowledge everyone knows. TEACH, don't document and call it writing.
 * Similarly, does that section belong so high in the article. Again, least interesting to the general reader stumbling onto the page. Should be down one section more, if not two. Rolling stock only matters to the kind of railfan known as rivet counters. Even most railfans agree that is extreme! (No doubt make good 3D V-scale content creators if they don't overdue the polys!) // Fra nkB 21:01, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Brunswick Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090423150353/http://www.mtamaryland.com:80/about/transitprofiles/MARC_History.cfm to http://mtamaryland.com/about/transitprofiles/MARC_History.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 11:30, 18 January 2016 (UTC)