Talk:Buah Rindu/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tim riley (talk · contribs) 11:16, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Starting first read-through. More soonest. – Tim riley (talk) 11:16, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Before formally assessing this article against the GA criteria, may I offer a few gratuitous points on the prose? They are just my personal thoughts, and don't affect the question of GA status (which I shall definitely be awarding, I may say).
 * Lead
 * "whilst" – I never know what this quaint word has to offer that "while" hasn't, apart from two unnecessary letters. There's another "whilst" later, too.
 * Done both. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:08, 10 November 2013 (UTC)


 * "highly fixed traditional" – I think "highly fixed" needs a hyphen. And also at its occurrence in the "Style" section.
 * I believe that MOS:HYPHEN suggests no hyphen (adverb, not adjective). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:08, 10 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Second para – two "highly"s in close proximity.
 * Removed one. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:08, 10 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Style
 * "in the center" – up to this point I thought we were using UK English ("coloured", "favourites") but now US English – or other variant – pops up.
 * Apologies. Now fixed. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:08, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

That's my lot. If you care to ponder and bat the ball back to me I'll do the GA formalities. – Tim riley (talk) 12:02, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:09, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Good grief! I've hardly had time to catch my breath. All's now done, and here's the paperwork:

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Bravo! – Tim riley (talk) 12:16, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Thank you! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:49, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Good grief indeed! Thanks both!♦ Dr. Blofeld  14:23, 10 November 2013 (UTC)