Talk:Buddhafield (cult)

Untitled
The original introduction stated "Buddhafield is a cult." The group, objectively, is a new religious movement. I changed the wording to reflect an objective view. It may very well be a cult. But the article should present facts without judgment. Since it has been described as a cult by former followers I have worded it that way. This also better connects it to the cult and NRM articles on Wikipedia. TimOliv (talk) 13:10, 25 April 2020 (UTC)


 * a religious movement whose sole purpose is the sexual and financial gratification of the leader is just that, a cult 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:6853:4F3E:D14F:3271 (talk) 14:00, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Huh? History
"Report on members perceived digressions?" Does the author mean "indiscretions" or "transgressions?" Reporting on someone's digressions seems rather pointless. Since I have not yet watched Holy Hell and do not know the information on the cult sufficient to know what the leader sought, post-Waco, I cannot correct this material, but it does remind me of this one time. . . .  Hithladaeus (talk) 01:45, 26 July 2020 (UTC)