Talk:Buffalo Creek (West Branch Susquehanna River tributary)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: TheQ Editor (talk · contribs) 21:06, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Review
I see how much you dedicated to this article. Great Job, and sorry for the incovenience... (I got distracted).  TheQ Editor     (Talk) 22:04, 16 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Well written
 * The section "history" should be the first section
 * The article should need a map
 * Should include wikilinks in infobox.


 * Referencing
 * The last paragraph to the lead section needs a reliable reference
 * The forests in the Buffalo Creek watershed are mostly deciduous hardwood, hemlock, and pine. needs a reference
 * To avoid a a long reflist, the reflist should be formatted with


 * Broadness
 * Covers all the main aspects. Double checked with Wikiproject Rivers


 * NPOV
 * no problems


 * Stability
 * Stable, no edit wars, in fact no vandalism ever detected!


 * Images
 * As I said earlier, needs a map.

Comments

 * "The section "history" should be the first section"
 * Actually, the course section comes first on most river articles in the area, like Fishing Creek (North Branch Susquehanna River).


 * "The article should need a map"
 * Added one, although User:Kmusser could probably make a better one (like this one).


 * "Should include wikilinks in infobox."


 * "The last paragraph to the lead section needs a reliable reference"
 * The lead section does not generally need references, see WP:LEAD.


 * "The forests in the Buffalo Creek watershed are mostly deciduous hardwood, hemlock, and pine. needs a reference"
 * The lead does not need references because it summarizes the article, which is referenced. This particular fact is repeated in the 3rd paragraph of the biology section and cited to reference #11.


 * "To avoid a a long reflist, the reflist should be formatted with "

--Jakob (talk) (my editor review) 23:39, 16 May 2014 (UTC)