Talk:Buglawton

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Buglawton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717164314/http://clc2.uniservity.com/GroupHomePage.asp?GroupId=255874 to http://clc2.uniservity.com/GroupHomePage.asp?GroupId=255874

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:33, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Merger proposal
I propose merging the information on Buglawton onto Congleton. I think while there is a lot of information on this article, Buglawton is not really a place of note, as it is a part of Congleton which is a town not a city and thus the information on Buglawton should just be a part of Congleton. Maurice Oly (talk) 00:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Oppose merge: as a former parish it has a distinct existence and merits its own article. Pam  D  06:37, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Strong oppose per WP:GEOLAND as it was also an urban district as well as a parish, there is no requirement for a place to be a city or town, villages are generally inherently notable.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 10:45, 18 March 2022 (UTC)