Talk:Buldana Urban Cooperative Credit Society

Referencing
It is clear that most new editors misunderstand referencing. is no exception. References must be about the subject of the article. These references do not refer to Buldana at all and must be removed. Indeed I will remove them shortly

http://www.aaccu.coop/ http://www.ica-ap.coop/ http://www.ncui.coop/welcome.html http://ica.coop/en/ica-youth-network http://www.aaccu.coop/

We require sourcing from significant coverage about the entity, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42 Please. Fiddle  Faddle  11:16, 24 June 2014 (UTC)


 * That's not quite true, Timtrent. References that establish the *notability* of a subject must be in-depth, reliable, and independent.  However, there may be portions of the article that provide context to the subject where perfectly good sources are used that may be lacking in one of these attributes.  In other words, there must be multiple references in an article that have all these attributes, but not *all* sources in an article must meet the attributes.  However, your assessment is correct in that many new editors use periphial sources to try to establish notability, or to try to make the subject appear more important than than it really is, often by WP:SYNTHESIS.    78.26   (His Wiki's Voice) 11:52, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Buldana Urban Cooperative Credit Society. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150119014258/http://buldanaurban.in/md.html to http://buldanaurban.in/md.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:16, 10 November 2016 (UTC)