Talk:Bulgarian Wikipedia

NOR.
I have recently removed some material (see history & edit comments) that appeared to be original research and speculation &mdash; content that was not verifiable at a reliable, pre-published source. I hope this doesn't bother anyone too much, but encyclopedic standards need to be upheld, even when an article is about Wikipedia itself. --Ds13 19:32, 21 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I wrote some of that "original research". I see you didn't remove everything I wrote. Before I read your updated version I was looking at some statistics again for the Bulgarian Wikipedia. I don't think the only heading in the Bulgarian Wikipedia page should be "Slow growth" or anything to that effect. I think it's really misleading. A lot of the statistics are much better than for a lot of the other wikipedias out there, even the ones ranked ahead of the Bulgarian Wikipedia. --Vanka5 06:04, 7 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I don't mind at all. In fact this revision was mine and I accept the accusations of speculation. I wtore this at that point, because I was really afraid that our version of the encyclopaedia was slowly dying out. Unfortunately the current state proves I was right in my fears. We have long ago lost momentum. Anyhow, my analysis from then is largely irrelevant today. --Cryout 00:49, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Spelling?
We've been getting strange emails at WP:OTRS about a spelling change. Can anyone explain what's going on? -- Jeandré, 2007-04-09t18:26z


 * If the requests concern articles on bg:, please tell them to ask at bg:У:Р (community's general talk page), or if a privacy is needed, to contact us at infoBG-L (at) wikimedia (dot) org . --5ko 20:52, 9 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Ack! I confused bg with Belarusian be: http://be-x-old.wikipedia.org/ Sorry.-- Jeandré, 2007-04-10t20:03z

Mobile version
The homepage for the Bulgarian Wikipedia has not yet been converted to a mobile phone version, at http://bg.m.wikipedia.org WhisperToMe (talk) 18:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)