Talk:Bull's Bridge/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 22:38, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

I'll take this JAG  UAR   22:38, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * I would recommend splitting the lead into two paragraphs to make the lead more balanced, per WP:LEAD
 * "Popular legend suggests that George Washington crossed the bridge with the Bull's assistance " - the bull? Isn't it referring to a person?
 * "Built with a Town lattice design" - why is town capitalised?
 * "half a mile from the border with New York State" - this could use a conversion
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

Nice work with this. This article meets the GA criteria, I see no reason to put this on hold. Promoting  JAG  UAR   22:44, 30 October 2015 (UTC)