Talk:Bull Riding Hall of Fame

Notability
Consensus was reached that this Bull Riding Hall of Fame was notable by discussion and comments on the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(sports)#Rodeo_-_Bull_Riding_Hall_of_Fame_notability_in_question thread. Notice the last comment by on the thread where she finalizes the thread and says she will add the HOF to the appropriate section, namely where the ProRodeo Hall of Fame is already added and approved. In her words, "If the folks who raised the initial concerns have no further concerns, I'd like to add the Bull Riding HOF to the HOF list at NRODEO, then." That was February 9, 2017, and no one has commented. I expect comments will be added soon. dawnleelynn (talk) 21:22, 14 February 2017 (UTC)


 * I ran earwig and it ran clean. Did some links, other cleanup, rearranged some stuff.  I think this is ready to go live, so I'm going to move it over. What you want to do is to search for “Bull Riding Hall of Fame” (click "search," not "go") and add wikilinks to the article on other articles that already mention it.  Montanabw (talk) 04:48, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Another note to all editors as to why there is a section describing some of the inductees other Hall of Fame accomplishments. This is here to help establishment the Bull Riding Hall of Fame's notability. What is the Bull Riding Hall of Fame's claim to fame? Who says its inductees are notable? It is a relatively new hall of fame that needs to establish itself in the nation as prominent. Truly, how many people have of heard of it compared to the prestigious ProRodeo Hall of Fame. By mentioning that it is inducting members who are already notable, it is bringing their notability to itself. Tuff Hedeman, Lane Frost, Chris Shivers, Bodacious, and so on. And by including proof that these notables who are still with us accept these honors and these honors are acknowledged in the press and other worthy online web sites, this is also helping the hall establish itself. dawnleelynn (talk) 20:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The material seems relevant to me. It’s sourced, it helps establish notability, the sources are reliable.  I’m comfortable keeping it in.  If anyone has a reason for the deletion, they can discuss it here.   Montanabw (talk) 20:53, 20 February 2017 (UTC)