Talk:Bullet graph

Seeking clarity
In the first paragraph, the wording "seemingly inspired by" is used. This is confusing: if bullet graphs are actually inspired by the other graphs mentioned then we should say so; if it isn't, then why mention that they appear as though they might be? Jkshapiro (talk) 17:10, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Bullet graph. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070822204929/http://www.datapigtechnologies.com:80/flashfiles/ExcelBulletGraphs.html to http://www.datapigtechnologies.com/flashfiles/ExcelBulletGraphs.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:55, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

IBCS® suggests three improvements
As can be seen by the article of Juergen Faisst at LinkedIn (External references list) IBCS® suggests three improvements which should be taken into account in practical applications of bullet graphs:

1 Omit the third range (light gray) because it has an arbitrary length 2 Normalize target values to facilitate visual evaluation 3 Highlight variances in order to understand the chart more quickly — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uwseidl (talk • contribs) 16:00, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Poor Quality Article
This article seems more like a blog post than a Wikipedia article. Needs to be flagged for style. If I had any Wiki experience, I'd do this myself, but I'm not... --158.180.128.10 (talk) 10:20, 11 July 2018 (UTC)