Talk:Burmese–Siamese War (1785–1786)

Article title
I think it should be either Nine Armies' War or Nine-Army War to be grammatically correct. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:42, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

No. It should move to Burmese-Siamese War (1785–1786). Because Nine army war is called from Siamese side. There is no Burmese account for it. I will change it later 220.255.2.98 (talk) 16:27, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Burmese–Siamese War (1785–86). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120514195207/http://www.m-culture.go.th/detail_page.php?sub_id=525 to http://www.m-culture.go.th/detail_page.php?sub_id=525

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:57, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Why is it (1785-76) and not (1786-87)?
Yourlocallordandsavior (talk) 09:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Probably because the article didn't originally consider the Tha Din Daeng Campaign to be part of the war. (I don't know if it should.) --Paul_012 (talk) 17:47, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * So should it be in the aftermath section? Yourlocallordandsavior (talk) 06:03, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * That would be consistent with how the article was arranged before User:Tanakorn Srichaisuphakit's 30 September 2021 edit. If he doesn't comment I'd support the change. --Paul_012 (talk) 10:32, 19 January 2022 (UTC)