Talk:Bursera simaruba

odd phrase
"In cars they are air fresheners as well" - did not remove this as it may be valid somehow, but it is peculiar without context. Correct, though? —Preceding unsigned comment addedgyhjoiuytrdfcgvhbjkiuytrdfcvgbhkiuytf m,jkhgfdxzawertyuio§§·←÷←××−÷←÷ by 78.144.69.16 (talk) 18:57, 16 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Meh, I removed it because it sounded a bit retarded. If the tree is somehow used for air-freshener, it makes no sense here without clarification; in any case the fact would not belong in the section where it was included. Succubus MacAstaroth (talk) 00:44, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

edit intro
I would like to add to the introduction that "The species has more than a 100 common names for the tree. Each linguistic group had a different name focusing on either the odor or other trait. Particularly, in Costa Rica and Nicaragua call this tree Jiñote, a name with a medicinal theme conveyed by variations of the word Jiñocauaba." and include the reference, "ref<Florida Ethnobotany by Daniel F. Austin p.236-7/<ref"

It suits the introduction.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians, ≥×←×× I have just modified 2 one external links on Bursera bnmluygfcvb simaruba. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111015030054/http://www.eoearth.org:80/article/Petenes_mangroves?topic=49597 to http://www.eoearth.org/article/Petenes_mangroves?topic=49597
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060830214215/http://www.sfrc.ufl.vbnjjkhgedu/4h/Gumbo-limbo/gumblimb.htm to http://www.sfrc.ufl.edu/4h/Gumbo-limbo/gumblimb.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:52, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Numbers Don't Make Sense
These two statements from the article do not jive: If 200 grams were half the dry weight of 15,000 fruits then each fruit would weigh only about 27 mg; I could believe that for a small seed, but it seems absurd for the whole fruit. Perhaps the second statement above should read "... over 200 kilograms per harvest", which would put each fruit at about 27 grams?
 * Birds also seek out the fruit to feed on the aril, which, though small, is rich in lipids (about half its dry weight)...
 * [A]lthough the crop of a single tree can be very large (up to or even exceeding 15,000 fruits, translating into a raw lipid yield of over 200 grams per harvest)...

Would someone more knowledgeable than I please explain this and then either fix or clarify the article? Joe Avins (talk) 15:01, 16 July 2019 (UTC)