Talk:Buru mountain pigeon/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jens Lallensack (talk · contribs) 20:41, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Reviewing now. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 20:41, 1 January 2022 (UTC)


 * link terms: generic and specific name; type locality
 * Linked.


 * Other common names for the species include Buru mountain-pigeon – I wouldn't call this a distinct common name, it is only a spelling variant that don't warrant mention?
 * Removed.


 * The Buru mountain pigeon was described as Columba mada – Who moved it when into Gymnophaps?
 * Added.


 * Gymnophaps – link to genus in main text. I would also include a sentence introducing this genus: Where are the species distributed? Common name seems to be "mountain pigeons"? Such context really helps.
 * Added the common name for the genus, but think that distributions would be too in-depth.
 * I was thinking about a sentence like "Gymnophaps species are distributed over eastern Indonesia and in the region of Melanesia". I really think it would help with understanding. See also WP:audience for further reasoning. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 16:36, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Added. AryKun (talk) 11:07, 3 January 2022 (UTC)


 * but was split on the basis of differences in appearance – when was it split, and by whom?
 * Added.


 * That's it – nice and very solid article! --Jens Lallensack (talk) 21:00, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * , I've addressed all of your concerns. AryKun (talk) 11:49, 2 January 2022 (UTC)