Talk:Bushfire CRC

.
Excuse me TtonyB: I'm sure you have the best of intentions. However, removing the contact details (erm "references"??), calling it "spam" and then loading the article with warnings that it has no references doesn't make much sense to me.

The reason this entry was created is because the organisation is already cited multiple times in Wikipedia. In fact the Bushfire CRC spawned the "Knowledge Web", subject of the article you'll find here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australasian_Fire_Authorities_Council

Which by the way includes contact details, no external authoritative references, and (until today) had no place to point its reference to the Bushfire CRC.

Could I ask that you let this article take a more elegant shape over the coming week? Thanks indeed. evox (talk) 13:00, 21 April 2011 (UTC)