Talk:Business continuity plan


 * Yes it should be merged. FNZ 4/4/07


 * Yes it should definitely be merged. Any other opinions? grafikm_fr 17:19, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Completely agree, the Business Continuity Planning article is much more thorough.Revmachine21

Yes, should be merged!
A "business continuity plan" is simply part of "business continuity planning." It is perhaps the primary product of the planning process, and a continuity plan has no meaning outside the context of continuity planning. My credentials: DRII certified planner, currently work as a continuity planner at a government agency.Stark 18:43, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Should be as a separate chapter in "business continuity planning", as this implies to a formal document of some kind. (Software Engineer, Manufacturing systems)


 * Merge --SueHay 00:16, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes, merge and correct the text on Business Continuity Plan also. In a plan is not a process, rather the result of a process... /ML

I also support a merge, per the above comments. The merge itself would have to be done carefully, though, since the Business continuity planning article is already lengthy and inevitably overlaps with information in this one. *Vendetta* (whois talk edits) 11:12, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Totally agree the two topics need merging!

To merge or not to merge?
I agree that there needs to be some consolidation between Business Continuity Planning and Business Continuity Plan.

The plan is a component (usually document output) from the planning process.

Graham Vingoe