Talk:Céline Gittens

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.brb.org.uk/profile/c%C3%A9line-gittens. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:31, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * All content was removed here because of copyright infringement; clearly I did a poor job of rewriting as a stub (which I usually try to do in such cases). However, the subject appears to be fully notable by our standards (55 real hits on Google News, several of them highly complimentary, including national press; and 28 hits on Highbeam, mostly local press and so carrying less weight). That's why I did not request deletion under criterion G12, for which it would have been fully eligible. I believe that an interesting article could be made here. I've removed the A7 speedy tag placed by . Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:31, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I am content with that. I thought that I had reverted my CSD nomination,- I certainly retracted the notice to the originating author. A CSD would have failed anyway because of intervening edits. However, it needs a lot of work to avoid a PROD in the near future.  Velella  Velella Talk 22:35, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't think so, . As I understand it, PROD can only be used where "no opposition to the deletion is expected", and since I've already outlined my reasons for opposing deletion on the talk page, that cannot apply here. AfD might succeed if she did not so clearly pass the GNG. I've no interest in the topic and no plans to work on this; stubs are good, I'm content to leave it as one until someone chooses to expand it. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:08, 23 April 2016 (UTC)