Talk:C. elegans (disambiguation)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on C. elegans (disambiguation). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140731140924/http://fossilworks.org/ to http://www.fossilworks.org/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718090827/http://www.paleodb.org/ to http://www.paleodb.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:23, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 8 August 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: not moved has volunteered to draft out a proper dab page, SIA not needed   Dr Strauss   talk   09:09, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

C. elegans (disambiguation) → List of species named C. elegans – This is a set-index article, not a disambiguation page. If it's to be kept as a disambiguation page, it will require extensive editing for compliance with MOS:DAB. --BDD (talk) 21:32, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Kill SIAs with fire. I'd rather leave this be incompliant with MOS:DAB, and I don't find "List of things named X" to be an encyclopedic topic. IAR and all that. No such user (talk) 10:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * If scientists, to save a bit of typing, keep shortening the model round worm's name Caenorhabditis elegans to C.elegans, presuming that "everybody knows" what is meant, it will annoy and confuse people who know more about some other of the many species named C... elegans. This list, like all disambiguation pages, is not encyclopedic as such, but it is necessary to help people to find the information that they need, when they find an unexplained mention of "C. elegans" and wonder which of many species it is. (Compare the annoying and confusing habit of some lepidopterists of referring to butterfly species by their specific names alone with no genus name, not even an initial.) Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:59, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I can draft a proper disambiguation page if users want this to remain as such. While I've spoken out against SIAs myself, as long as they're distinct entities, this page is currently an SIA regardless of title. --BDD (talk) 17:26, 9 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.


 * Ah, I've missed this discussion. Yes, a name like the one proposed by BDD would obviously have been more in line with what the article looks like at present. Trying to convert it into another format to save the bad title would be a cosmic waster of time, and any mention of "volunteering" to do so is I hope only a figure of speech. – Uanfala 15:49, 24 August 2017 (UTC)