Talk:C14 Timberwolf/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Starting review. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:03, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Quick fail criteria assessment
 * 1) The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.
 * References need to be properly formatted, please read and understand WP:Cite. Bare html refrences are not suitable for a GA. There is an outstanding citation needed tag. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:18, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.
 * OK
 * 1) There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.
 * See above Jezhotwells (talk) 21:18, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.
 * OK
 * 1) The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.
 * not applicable.


 * further to above the acronyms such as MRSWS and PGW need explanation when first used. The grammar is poor - the article is not reasonably well written. It does not really follow WP:MOS. statements such as "Below is some more in depth information on the MRSWS." are not encyclopaediac. I am quickfailing this article.  Please bring back when expanded, rewritten and properly cited. At present this is merely start class. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:18, 19 May 2009 (UTC)