Talk:C3H6

Polypro
I've removed
 * * Polypropylene

on the ground that its formula, in the scheme the Cat seems to rely on, is not
 * C3H6

but rather
 * (C3H6)n

Do not the Dabs
 * C6H10O5

and
 * (C6H10O5)n

(which was the first item listed in the Cat when i started working on it this weekend) clearly demonstrate the intention to make the distinction between monomers and polymers? If someone thinks the polymer one is the problem, let's hear about the discussion that established that, since the distinction is intuitively important and rejection of it inherently sacrifices clarity without any obvious compensating benefit. Without prejudice to further discussion, i've added the corresponding Rdr (and bear in mind that this cat concerns only Dabs). --Jerzy•t 00:34, 25 July 2011 (UTC)