Talk:C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group

Add related wikinews and world's population
Add world's population and current 'C40' news ... You seem deletion "trigger happy" sometimes User:Arthur Rubin, what gives? 97.87.29.188 (talk) 22:04, 21 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Clearly inappropriate. Wikinews interlinks are supposed to be for categories of news articles, not individual articles.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 06:45, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Bloomberg and Clinton create green alliance still up for discussion. 97.87.29.188 (talk) 21:44, 22 April 2011 (UTC)


 * See related discussion on Talk:Politics of global warming (United States). 99.190.85.25 (talk) 22:40, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * This Michael Bloomberg, the current Mayor of New York, and its second wealthiest person, after David H. Koch? 99.112.213.34 (talk) 01:29, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Continue with related wikinews topic, as in many wp articles ...  99.56.120.243 (talk) 03:10, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Why? We've got one of the actual news articles supporting the Wikinews entry as a reference.  Why use Wikinews?  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 05:44, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * From Template:Wikinews/doc: "... and is not intended to represent sources for Wikpedia articles." — Arthur Rubin (talk) 08:39, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The repeated addition is still inappropriate. Please give a reason for it to be there, in light of the documentation quote, above.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 20:11, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * From Template:Wikinews/doc: "This template is normally placed at the top of the WP:External links section. If the news story primarily relates to one part of the article, it may be placed at the top of the appropriate section."
 * I see no reason why that should be read as "at the top of the relevant paragraph". — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 20:14, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Any reason not to follow the guidelines in Template:Wikinews/doc? — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 02:04, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Add Wikinews|Category:Environment|Environment and Wikinews|Category:Climate change|Global warming
Add 108.73.113.64 (talk) 19:50, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Why? — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 07:54, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Linking Wikinews and wp when relevant and helpful to "the reader", of course. 99.35.12.122 (talk) 22:48, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * They are tangential links, not worthy of a "See also" section. For example,  is only relevant to Environment and Category:Environment, not to all environmental articles.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 03:32, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Stop adding it until you can supply a reason. — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 01:46, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Expand from useful reference World Bank to Help Cities Control Climate Change
From World Bank to Help Cities Control Climate Change by Alexei Barrionuevo: June 1, 2011 New York Times:  99.181.155.61 (talk) 20:39, 2 June 2011 (UTC) ... some excerpt ideas from source. 99.181.155.61 (talk) 20:44, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Add Environmental statistics ? 99.109.126.237 (talk) 22:17, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Add Greenhouse_gas 99.19.42.127 (talk) 01:52, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * More Talk deletion by User:Arthur Rubin here ... How are you still an "Admin", really? There is a more efficient way to end your time a wikipedia ... Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you.   Per Special:Contributions/Arthur Rubin, User:Arthur Rubin (Arthur Rubin) continues to hide other's Talk, May 19th on User Talk:Zodon http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zodon&diff=429845197&oldid=429841834  ... on March 30th 2011 it was User talk:Granitethighs http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Granitethighs&diff=prev&oldid=421531277 and User talk:OhanaUnited  http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:OhanaUnited&diff=421531280&oldid=421528249 These are related to Template:Sustainability and Sustainability (and related topics).
 * Or Be a sweetums? 99.181.140.6 (talk) 04:38, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * As your "Add ..." statements make no sense, I probably should just hat them, rather than delete them. However, WP:TALK suggests that statements not credibly related to improving the article be removed.  No credible reason has been supplied why environmental statistics or greenhouse gas be added to the article.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 06:54, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Why would you delete someone's comments just because they don't make sense to you? (Talk page guidelines)  97.87.29.188 (talk) 20:19, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Per WP:TALK, it is quite proper to delete comments not related to improving the article. If they make no sense whatsover, they probably aren't related to improving the article.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 05:42, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Quite extremist wording Mr. Rubin, "not related" and "make no sense whatsover". That kind of talk is not constructive. Please temper your comments. 97.87.29.188 (talk) 20:43, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * "Makes no sense whatsover" is accurate. As you admit you're not fluent in English, perhaps you can post your ideas in your own language, and we can see if someone can translate it into English.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 20:48, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * "Not related" may be a matter of opinion, in some cases. However, violations of WP:CANVASS and of WP:NPA can be deleted, even by involved parties.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 20:50, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * To whom are you writing Mr. Rubin? 97.87.29.188 (talk) 21:00, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * To anyone who doesn't believe you are being disruptive. That seems to include  exclude almost all logged in editors.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 03:24, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * If you are to continue making comments such as that Special:Contributions/Arthur Rubin, please back them up with evidence. At best, that is hearsay.  99.190.87.183 (talk) 05:28, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, I can name three other editors who have specifically commented that your posts are disruptive. Can you name one who has specifically commented that your posts are not disruptive?  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 05:46, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Special:Contributions/99.190.87.183, a long winded-way of say "no" ... 99.119.131.17 (talk) 03:05, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Using your own contributions to support your contributions is, well, fatuous. — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 08:23, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Where is the 2012 to be held?
Where is the 2012 to be held? 99.119.128.87 (talk) 02:30, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Add?
Add as reaction to Regional effects of global warming? 99.190.83.243 (talk) 05:34, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

resource, not sure of where in wp

 * Green team Nov 1, 2011 12:00 PM American City & County, by Patti Southard "County connects cities to move sustainability initiatives forward"


 * http://americancityandcounty.com/topics/green/

99.181.136.158 (talk) 01:05, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Maybe ICLEI would be closer, depending on the cities involved? 99.19.45.187 (talk) 05:20, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Propaganda
So, while trying to research c40, I came across this, and I cant say I'm impressed. the intro itself seems to be right from their marketing manual, and while I am not in a position to do so - I feel it is important that this entire page is re-done in a neutral manner.

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311211412/http://www.london.gov.uk/mayor/environment/climate-summit/documents.jsp to http://www.london.gov.uk/mayor/environment/climate-summit/documents.jsp
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070512210748/http://www.nycclimatesummit.com/ to http://www.nycclimatesummit.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:00, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Climate change
Climate change is a fraud, compliance mandated for the little people of the world, while those from Bill Gates to Tony Blair fly from A to B in their climate killing private jets to dictate why your life should change, and why theirs shouldn't.

Everything in play now to monitor, track & control people:

92.40.218.85 (talk) 11:35, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Pandemic treaty - travel
 * 15 min cities - travel
 * Net zero - social credit
 * Tax - surveillance
 * Online harms bill - narrative
 * Police & crime bill - stop protests
 * Central Banking Digital Currency - total control

Steering Committee
On their website the members of the Steering Committee are different? www.c40.org/cities/ Alexanderkowal (talk) 17:01, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

very subjective. statements made as facts not proven
This article makes many statements that are not accompanied by evidence. The article is highly opiniated and presents far too many "facts" that are no more than the opinion of the authors. The article needs major revisions to make it reflect reality rather than the fantasy world of the authors 192.0.238.35 (talk) 14:03, 26 October 2023 (UTC)