Talk:CAC/PAC JF-17 Thunder/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 05:20, 3 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks for starting the review. I am busy these days. Hopefully, I will start working on it the next weekend. Fai  zan  05:09, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Just a reminder that this article will fail if the above points are not addressed, seven days are up tomorrow UTC. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 03:15, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I have failed the article on the basis of a lack of response over the last seven days regarding the significant issues around prose, verifiability and coverage. I strongly suggest all the above points are addressed before re-nomination. A peer review and GOCE copy edit would also be advisable. It is likely that if renominated without addressing the issues above, the article will be quick-failed. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 03:16, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I have addressed the points above. Removed redundant references from the lead, updated squadron information, expanded the acronyms, removed repetitions, corrected factual errors, delinked overlinked links, added incidents and accidents section, and renominated it. Ping Peacemaker, can you please review it? I am available now and will work to address any further issues. Fai  zan  13:40, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * G'day Faizan. It hasn't been copy-edited or peer reviewed as I suggested, only one instance of impenetrable jargon has been fixed, and it doesn't seem stable to me. On that basis, I will not review it again. Good luck with the new nomination. Regards, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 14:05, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * G'day Sir. It was copyedited in August 2014 before this review started, I had requested the guild earlier. I am searching for the instances of jargon and will fix them all. Fai  zan  17:10, 3 January 2015 (UTC)