Talk:CASTOR (nuclear waste)

CASTOR v Dry cask storage
Can we make this page a redirect to Dry cask storage? After all, CASTOR is simply a trademark for a specific storage system. Everything on the current CASTOR page is available there, and the German page Castor (Kerntechnik) does link there as well.

Ansgaard (talk) 09:27, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

Page moved to CASTOR (nuclear waste). Consensus was clear about moving, the target was unclear. Most of the inbound links were for the CERN experiment, so this move seems the best solution at this time for a stub that could easily be deleted without a lot of cleanup. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:08, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

CASTOR → CAsk for Storage and Transport Of Radioactive material — "CASTOR" should redirect to the disambiguation page, there are several prominent uses of the initialism. This would expand the acronym and camelcasing would solve the problem of genericity. 70.24.251.158 (talk) 05:26, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.


 * Oppose. I have two problems with this proposal. (1) It seems to me that this use of CASTOR is by far the most common. If that is true then there is no problem with it occupying this lemma. (2) Camel casing to emphasize the genesis of an acronym is inappropriate according to MOSCAPS. --EnOreg (talk) 12:39, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Move to Cask for Storage and Transport of Radioactive Material or Castor (nuclear waste). The thing under chairs seems to be a fairly common usage, you've also got castor oil and a few other things  Purpleback  pack  89  ≈≈≈≈  23:11, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * These other things are all lower-case castor. They don't collide with with the all-caps CASTOR. --EnOreg (talk) 12:46, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Discussion

 * Any additional comments:

Alternately CASTOR (nuclear waste) is possible. 70.24.251.158 (talk) 05:38, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

The only other uses of the name CASTOR that the Castor disambiguation page lists are CERN advanced storage manager, for which not even an article exists, and a CASTOR experiment at CERN that seems rather obscure to a non-expert. Which of these do you think is more "prominent" than the cask for spent nuclear fuel? --EnOreg (talk) 12:46, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

This move was premature. There was obviously no consensus, yet. Your argument about the inbound links is compelling but you should have made it before the move. (I assume you compare the number of inbound links to this article with the number for the experiment?)

I moved the article on from the misspelled Castor (nuclear waste) to the correctly spelled CASTOR (nuclear waste). I'm still not entirely happy with the name as a CASTOR is actually the cask rather than the waste. Oh well. --EnOreg (talk) 13:32, 26 October 2011 (UTC)