Talk:CA Immo

Defence of article
I completely disagree that this article should be deleted. I have been adding sources and don't have time to write a detailed rebuttal but my goal is to finish creating articles for the remaining companies on the ATX over the next month or so and this is a part of that project - it's completely reasonable that the 20 largest companies in Austria should all have Wikipedia articles even if they're quite short or the company mostly doesn't operate in English-speaking areas.

There's also no shortage of further sources to cite, though I do concede that there are limits to how many I can add since this company mostly seems to operate in Eastern Europe and I don't speak any Eastern European languages. (Incidentally, I'm slightly surprised to see this article listed for deletion since I could find so many sources on it - the other ATX company I created an article on seems much less known.) I gather that an article on the same company not created by me has been deleted before, but I hope this article is good enough to stand. There also seems plenty of room for further expansion looking at the German Wikipedia article, and I hope to translate more of this into English when I have time. In any case, following the citations I've added this morning, the quality of this article is already better than average for its field. For comparison, of the 17 other ATX companies that have Wikipedia articles this article has more sources than all but two of them. So four days after its creation this article is the third-best sourced in its sector. Blythwood (talk) 08:47, 13 November 2015 (UTC)