Talk:CBCL-FM

Inclusion
For the record, the standard on Wikipedia for inclusion of a radio station is not simply being licensed as a separate station; the second criterion that has to be fulfilled is that the station directly produces at least a portion of its own programming schedule in its own studios. Plenty of radio and television stations in both Canada and the United States are nominally separate stations but exist only as rebroadcasters of other stations in actual practice; the convention on Wikipedia is that those are redirected to their programming source. See, frex, Alabama Public Television, an entity which consists of nine individually-licensed stations but offers no schedule variance from one station to the next. I'm not convinced that a local news bureau which provides a few minutes of local news headlines is sufficient for inclusion of a CBC station that doesn't even produce its own local morning show. Bearcat 17:09, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Inclusion II
Even the BBM doesn't recognize CBCL as a separate station - they consider London to receive CBLA. I don't see the need for this article. On the Radio Two side, CBBL broadcasts a different identification than CBL-FM, but there's no separate article for CBBL.

Mjlarochelle 01:15, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:CBCRadioOne.png
The image Image:CBCRadioOne.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --01:50, 17 May 2008 (UTC)