Talk:CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada

Jargon and wording
The article has legal writing and not clear writing style: Under "Subsistence of copyright:
 * You don't answer issues you answer questions - fixed
 * "court looks at", then McLachlin is listed, who is it, the court or a person? The present tense? Is this not complete? - mclachlin is writing for the court, as reported early
 * Then why O'Connor, who is that? - former USSC judge
 * finally title ?subsistence, meaning "reality" in my dictionary - it's a technical term, perhaps it needs a page?

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120707205439/http://lawjournal.mcgill.ca/documents/dAgostino.pdf to http://lawjournal.mcgill.ca/documents/dAgostino.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:16, 28 July 2017 (UTC)