Talk:CHMB

Fair use rationale for Image:Chmblogo.gif
Image:Chmblogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:23, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Reasons for reverting Rightthings (again)
As was previously noted on the new editor Rightthings' talk page when I last reverted his/her contribution, one of the many carefully chosen rules for Wikipedia editors is that we cannot introduce "original research", meaning information from only our own knowledge. We can use only information that is provided by a "verifiable source". If you can identify and cite a verifiable source for your new information, you can put it back in. This time, I also not that we must use an "encyclopedic style" of writing. This precludes statements like those I reverted: "For further information, ..." (unsourced), "It should be clearly understood that..." (unsourced), "Please see the full Reuters article." followed by the same citation that has already appeared. Finally, Wikipedia editors must maintain a neutral point of view, reporting only what the reliable sources say, with no extra opinions from the editor. Layzeeboi (talk) 22:34, 14 November 2015 (UTC)