Talk:CIA secret prisons

delete
This should be deleted and the subject put in the CIA Controversies section. maybe not

Merge
This looks like it should be merged as suggested. Note: It's an orphan article. --W.marsh 20:44, 7 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Support merge to Black site. Badagnani 12:26, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Support merge to Black site. Tracer9999 11:26, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Support merge to Black site per nom. --Ludvig 21:19, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Coincidence as evidence
An anti-US source (Al Jazeera) wrote:
 * Carroll Bogert, associate director of the New York-based Human Rights Watch, outlined earlier what had led the group to believe Poland and Romania were hosting the alleged CIA prisons.
 * She said the group based its assumption on flight logs, such as a Boeing 737 having made trips to eastern Europe from Afghanistan and countries in the Middle East.
 * One flight log showed that a plane went from Kabul to northeastern Poland on 22 September 2003. That was the same month that "we know several CIA prisoners who were held in Afghanistan were transferred out of Afghanistan and the next day the same plane landed at a military airport in Romania," Bogert said.

5 year anniversery
The fact the secret prisons were disclosed before the 5 year aniversary is irrelevant to the article. your assuming because "some have speculated", that what they say is the truth.. People are not stupid.. they can do the math. by adding that piece "5 days before the 5 year 9/11 anniversary" your still implying your point of view wether you just come out and say it or not. who knows if it was timed. maybe maybe not.. not sure what the political benefits of that would be? If anything it would publicize the fact more. who cares, it was disclosed and not on page 50 like they usually bury things. let people draw there own conclusions instead of placing subtle hints at your pov. how does everyone else feel about this.. If most people feel that piece of info is necassary in the article Ill leave it be.