Talk:CJIB-FM

Requested move 4 June 2018

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Moved to CJIB-FM. No such user (talk) 11:47, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

CKIZ-FM → CJIB-FM – Per notice from Canadian Broadcast Sales national ad sales agency that effective January 25, 2018, CKIZ-FM's callsign was changed to CJIB-FM. Doug Mehus (talk) 01:20, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Support. Strictly speaking, Canadian Broadcast Sales is a primary source (a company with which many radio stations are directly affiliated, and is thus completely impossible to judge its accuracy and reliability by any of the standards we can use to judge the reliability of a real media outlet) rather than a reliable one, but Industry Canada's Spectrum Management database (the definitive source for radio or TV call sign changes in Canada) also confirms this change. So any slim possibility that this was an error on the part of Canadian Broadcast Sales is foreclosed. Bearcat (talk) 17:01, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Can you provide a link to where this is detailed? Thanks! ƒirefly  ( t · c · who? ) 08:48, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I said a lot there. Can you clarify which part you meant by "this"? Bearcat (talk) 15:02, 14 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
 * Sorry, the "Industry Canada's Spectrum Management database (the definitive source for radio or TV call sign changes in Canada) also confirms this change" bit - is that detailed on a website somewhere? ƒirefly  ( t · c · who? ) 17:13, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah, okay. It's a government database of all active radio stations, but unfortunately it processes searches internally so the results page doesn't actually produce a distinct URL that can be directly linked to — if you wanted to verify it yourself, the only way to do so would be to go to the database and rerun the search. Bearcat (talk) 18:34, 14 June 2018 (UTC)