Talk:CNN/YouTube presidential debates

Not from a moderator?
I realize that this is essentially original research, but how can we say that "The Democratic Party installment was the first presidential debate to have a question that did not come from a moderator"? Anyone familiar with the 2004 presidential elections knows that the second debate had questions written and asked by members of the audience, albeit questions that were preselected by a moderator. If you are not familiar with this debate, please see United States presidential election debates, 2004 and write back with your opinion. BassoProfundo 18:51, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 * After looking at the statement and your comment, I reworded it so it would clearer. Here is the new version of it: The Democratic Party installment was the first presidential debate to have a question asked by someone other than a moderator. Pants (T) 19:11, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 * That's still not true; the questions in the 2004 "town hall" debate were asked by the audience members themselves. BassoProfundo 20:30, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I removed it, even though it had a source. The article (Reuters) must have had a mistake. Pants (T) 23:16, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Peer review
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question. You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Pants (T) 20:23, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Consider adding more links to the article; per WP:MOS-L and WP:BTW, create links to relevant articles.
 * Per WP:WIAFA, Images should have concise captions.
 * This article does not have any categories. Please categorize it with relevant.
 * Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
 * Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “ All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
 * Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on CNN/YouTube presidential debates. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081118114101/http://usliberals.about.com/b/a/257922.htm to http://usliberals.about.com/b/a/257922.htm
 * Added tag to http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19930669/site/newsweek/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071201152222/http://www.commentarymagazine.com:80/blogs/index.php/jpodhoretz/1441 to http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/jpodhoretz/1441

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:57, 12 November 2016 (UTC)