Talk:COGIX

Proposed Deletion
It is proposed that this article be deleted because of the following concern:

No evidence of passing WP:GNG.

If you can address this concern by improving, copyediting, sourcing, renaming, or merging the page, please edit this page and do so. You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason. Although not required, you are encouraged to explain why you object to the deletion, either in your edit summary or on the talk page. If this template is removed, do not replace it.

The article may be deleted if this message remains in place for seven days, i.e., after 16:46, 22 July 2017 (UTC). If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article so that it is acceptable according to the deletion policy. Nominator: Please consider notifying the author/project.

Here is my objection against deletion according to WP:GNG

If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list.

--Gunnar (talk) 20:03, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) "Significant coverage" The German CHP sector covers about 30 GW, in the EU it is >100 GW. The question on the economics is important.
 * 2) "Reliable" Matthes/Ziesing have published this index first in 2011, VKU (association of municipal utilities) payed for and uses it, others reuse it.
 * 3) "Sources" do not have to be available online or written in English but there are many German sources available which are translateable.
 * 4) "Independent of the subject" As common in academia, Matthes from Öko-Institut publishes regularly on the COGIX, but there are also secondary sources.
 * 5) "Presumed" I presume that the COGIX concept is an interesting topic worth an wiki article, as it is an extension of the spark spread methodology for CHP.


 * For all German speaking readers, here is a talk by Felix Matthes on CHP including the COGIX. --Gunnar (talk) 22:58, 15 July 2017 (UTC)