Talk:CONOP 8888

Nice
Dang, forgot this plan even existed until I saw it on Unusual Articles. Kind of a shame the article is a stub, because this is amazing.

1700 (talk) 18:14, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Wording for the first paragraph
Hey Toadspike I didn't want to revert your revert without checking with you. I'd added "in a fictional military training scenario" to the first sentence because:

"People are mistaking this as a serious document. I assume it's because of the visual break caused by the four citations and the date. Made it clearer that this is not a real scenario anticipated by the USDOD"

Was the removal of that on purpose? If not I'm going to re-add it (and if so please lmk here and we can discuss.)

Egefeyzi (talk) 04:26, 11 July 2024 (UTC)


 * @Egefeyzi Thanks for the ping. I don’t think I removed the phrase “fictional military training scenario” on purpose. It looks like it’s currently farther down in the article. You may move it back to the first sentence if you wish. Toadspike   [Talk]  21:16, 11 July 2024 (UTC)