Talk:COSCO fleet lists

Proposed deletion
I have deleted the proposed deletion notice for the following reasons:

! - The inormation is not readily available from the subjects's own website, I've had to collate the information from several seperate pages from three different major sources, also using some minor sources, not yet listed, for verification.

2 - If a lst of the company's ships is not considered suitable for an encyclopaedia, then I propose for deletion the iist of ships belonging to the White Star Line, The British Tanker Company, Cunard Line, Royal Mail Steam Packet Co, etc etc etc. Also the many lists of the ships of various navies, all of which are only correct up to the day published and all require maintenance in the future. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 19:16, 28 August 2017 (UTC)


 * (1) The fleet lists of the White Star Line, Cunard, etc are unlikely to change in the future. COSCO will likely change five percent per year.

Are you suggesting Cunard will not acquire any more ships?


 * (2) Unless you, or someone as dedicated, is willing to maintain it, it should be COSCO fleet list as of 2017. That's WP:Listcruft
 * (3) Navy ships are often notable in their own rights. I doubt these are.

Depends whether you have an interest in modern commercial shipping.


 * (4) This list belongs in COSCO not just a wikilink as you have done. See WP:Listcruft
 * Rhadow (talk) 19:35, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

No point in putting it in there if you are going to delete it anyway.

Murgatroyd49 (talk) 20:41, 28 August 2017 (UTC)


 * I didn't delete COSCO list of ships. I suggested it was a bad idea. You removed the PROD. That's over with.


 * Apologies, I was a bit too terse, I meant if it was felt to be superflous, then there was no point in moving it to be deleted anyway. The 'you' was general, not personal.

Murgatroyd49 (talk) 08:21, 29 August 2017 (UTC)


 * I too have an interest in modern commercial shipping. I wish someone would write a piece about the Christophe de Margerie. She deserves her own article. Rhadow (talk) 20:56, 28 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The ice-breaking LNG carrier? Now you have me intrigued!

Murgatroyd49 (talk) 08:21, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 13 December 2020

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move after the relist  (t &#183; c)  buidhe  20:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

COSCO fleet lists → COSCO Shipping fleet lists – the main topic of this list, (aka, China Ocean Shipping (Group) Corporation) has been merged with China Shipping Group, the parent company of the former China Shipping Container Lines, to became China COSCO Shipping (for some reason, the current article is just COSCO Shipping). It seems it better recycled this list to cover also the fleet of the enlarged group and move the article title to.

One minor problem is all cap COSCO or not, as COSCO is not a 100% abb of China Ocean Shipping (Group) Corporation due to the last "CO" stand for "Co.".

Lastly, A big nono to capitalized as BTW, despite the company do so officially. Matthew hk (talk) 06:30, 13 December 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. Jack Frost (talk) 13:29, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * One problem is that it doesn’t include the China Shipping Group fleet so, at the moment, the current title is accurate. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 17:57, 14 December 2020 (UTC)


 * At least CSCL fleet lists or China Shipping fleet lists does not exist so that RM is sufficient. If it stick as the old namespace, should the list to maintain to "current" 2020 year condition or freeze at pre-merger, 2015 condition? At least according to photo, CSCL Globe use COSCO Shipping livery now. And not sure after the deal completion, OOCL fleet use OOCL livery or COSCO Shipping.... Matthew hk (talk) 18:13, 14 December 2020 (UTC)