Talk:C and D-class destroyer/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 17:45, 10 October 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Maybe add a couple images to the service section - right now it's pretty much a big "wall-o-text". This isn't a requirement for GA though, just a suggestion.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Everything looks to be in order, excellent work as usual, Sturmvogel. Parsecboy (talk) 17:45, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Maybe add a couple images to the service section - right now it's pretty much a big "wall-o-text". This isn't a requirement for GA though, just a suggestion.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Everything looks to be in order, excellent work as usual, Sturmvogel. Parsecboy (talk) 17:45, 10 October 2011 (UTC)