Talk:Caerphilly Castle/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dana boomer (talk · contribs) 15:56, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have my full review up shortly. Dana boomer (talk) 15:56, 20 January 2013 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * I made a couple of small tweaks - please check to make sure I didn't screw anything up :)
 * Dab link to Hugh le Despenser. I fixed a few other dabs; please check to make sure I chose the right links.
 * 14-17th centuries, "there is no evidence of a slighting having been ordered." What is a slighting?
 * Clarified. Hchc2009 (talk) 16:54, 20 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Is there any information on how many tourists tour the castle annually?
 * Added. Hchc2009 (talk) 16:54, 20 January 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * In the notes you have links to Davies 1981 and 1995, but in the references you give Davies 1981 and 1990.
 * Fixed. Hchc2009 (talk) 16:54, 20 January 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I am passing the GAN. There are a few comments above, regarding prose and one references niggle, but these are not enough to get in the way of GA status. Very nice work, Dana boomer (talk) 16:33, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I am passing the GAN. There are a few comments above, regarding prose and one references niggle, but these are not enough to get in the way of GA status. Very nice work, Dana boomer (talk) 16:33, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I am passing the GAN. There are a few comments above, regarding prose and one references niggle, but these are not enough to get in the way of GA status. Very nice work, Dana boomer (talk) 16:33, 20 January 2013 (UTC)