Talk:Caijing

Untitled
As far as I know, Caijing is a Chinese-language magazine with no English edition. Why list it as one of the major English language business and finance magazine? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Huangmintao (talk • contribs) 06:32, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

speculate no more folks
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/10/business/global/10mag.html she resigned under pressure, and has taken up a new post as dean of the journalism school of dr. sun yat sen university in canton. with that new position, she has leverage to negotiate new publishing licenses for NEW magazine caixing, which includes most of the staff from the old magazine caijing.

Lucky dog (talk) 21:32, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

?
The page as written now seems to be either written by someone involved in Caijing's marketing, or is based entirely on such sources

--

Highly suspect. Syntax irregularities suggest that it might have been written by a native speaker of a language other than English; could it be someone affiliated with the magazine? This article could use more of an "independent standpoint" and less "exclusive coverage" to be more effective in its main goal, which should be educating wikipedia users about Caijing. Any readers of the magazine out there who know anything about it?

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.141.250.223 (talk) 17:36, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

"Caijing take[s] independence, unique[ness], [and] original[ity] as its principle[s]."

An official slogan to that effect or a quote from a credible commentator is needed to say that. -- Djinn112 02:01, Feb 13, 2004 (UTC)

"Investigation and Design Center of Chinese securities business" does not seem like the official translation of whatever this organization is. Please provide the native Chinese title in parenthesis. --Menchi 03:22, 13 Feb 2004 (UTC)

"Contemporary Caijing" is too subjective. please provide sources of those viewpoints.

T2Jeff, you need to cite wherever you got all of the statistics in the survey from April 2001 from. --T2HollandTroy 23:24, Feb 22, 2004

T2HollandTroy, thanks very much. I neayly forget it. I will add it

T2 Jeff

--- T2LeeJacky, the photo have already released and can make the content more activity. right? what do you think about ?

T2 Jeff

--- Photos copying from other websites will only lead to mark deduction.

T2Jacky

T2Jacky, you cannot delete Jeff's addition to the page and not even note it in page history. If you've taken it down to edit it, that's fine, but if it's not back up within the hour, I'll put it back myself. I can correct and polish this page, but not if you take stuff down. I also understand you've worked hard on it, but it is not "yours." --T2HollandTroy 00:26, Feb 24, 2004

T2Jacky I really dont know how to do the wiki perfectly. Maybe you know that, right? I just re-write the essay with my own words when got some information from the internet! do you think there are any problems?

In my opinion, the wiki practise is not just a assignment of the course but resource for the world. Everybody can know about sth conveniently from the wiki.

BTW: Please note it in the page history when you modify anything. that is polite.

T2Jeff

Situation of Caijing after Hu Shuli left?
Under 'Assessments' section:

"According to Periodical China, Caijing's evolution has been closely tied to Hu, and if Hu leaves the magazine in the future, Caijing's future could be greatly affected."

She left already some years ago. What happened after? Did the editorial line change? Did Caijing replace the staff that have left? Is circulation good as before. Did Caixin became the new 'reference' paper?

"History" section should also be updated. 116.6.52.162 (talk) 05:46, 29 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Agreed. It seems to at least some interesting reporting is still happening, per  twitter short link 7rM69CWPkF (Article on apparently un-reportable CoV-19 deaths).  But also, there's https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caixin, which Hu founded after being forced from Caijing. See NYTimes link above, as well. --50.201.195.170 (talk) 02:49, 2 March 2020 (UTC)