Talk:Cal Ripken Jr./GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sportsguy17 (talk · contribs) 01:06, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

I will be reviewing this article. I look forward to working with you,. Tell me when you want to get started. For this next week, I will be available Dec 22 and 23, a little less on Dec 24, 25, and 26. And I am going snowboarding Dec 27-29 without good internet. Tell me what you can do. Thanks. Sports guy17 ( T  •  C ) 01:06, 22 December 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm glad to see you'll be understanding about time, because I actually won't have internet access all week. If you don't mind waiting till the 30th, that would be great. Thank you for taking up this article, and have a nice Christmas! Oriolesfan8 (talk) 12:29, 22 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks and enjoy your holidays and vacation. Sports guy17  ( T  •  C ) 19:02, 22 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Ready to begin when you are. Oriolesfan8 (talk) 16:20, 31 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Awesome. Reflinks looks good, albeit Checklinks is a little concerning. Try if possible to check any links that are not white, especially the red-highlighted link and if needed, replace it. Next, I shall be giving a section-by-section analysis/review. Sportzilla &#124; ROA R R! !   02:39, 2 January 2014 (UTC) Note: Alternate account of Sportsguy17

- This is brilliant, splendid, well-referenced, great use of visuals, and a pleasure to read. Here are my initial thoughts broadly speaking:

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality, no copyvios, spelling and grammar:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Pass!  Sports guy17  ( T •  C ) 13:39, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

So, although there are a few dead links and redirecting links, it is very well-referenced and very good to read. I will work with spelling & grammar and see what I find. Sportzilla &#124; ROA R R! !   02:52, 2 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The spelling and grammar looked good and I didn't find any copyvios, so here is a pass for you.  Sports guy17  ( T •  C ) 13:41, 4 January 2014 (UTC)