Talk:Calcium in biology

Protists in quotation marks
Why is protists in quotation marks? It is a perfectly valid scientific term. Have removed them. 82.153.195.203 08:30, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Calcium and the heart
Isn't calcium necissary for the heart to beat? --Susan Walton 23:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Calcium content of beans
Can the calcium content of the common bean be added? Badagnani (talk) 00:41, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Calcium in biology---2 Non-humans
There are some problems of the first paragraph. Something like''===formula here phosphate  [[Media:Insert non-formatted]] text hereInsert non-formatted text here  ===Other eukaryotes== Insert non-formatted text hereInsert non-formatted text here ]]'' appear in the text and I think there is no relationship with the text. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deluxenville (talk • contribs) 11:17, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Sesame seeds - good that they get mentioned
Good to see that the section on food sources of calcium refers to sesame seeds. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 16:46, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Calcium in biology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050929135558/http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/Data/SR17/wtrank/sr17a301.pdf to http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/Data/SR17/wtrank/sr17a301.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:05, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Humans/Dietary recommendations
Created section Humans to include Dietary recommendations, Food sources and Measurement in blood. David notMD (talk) 13:24, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Contradiction
In Dietary recommendations: "May 27, 2016 it was revised to 1300 mg to bring it into agreement with the RDA." In the table it says: "19-50 years	1000" Should the table not say 19-50 years 1300mg? Mermaidthrone (talk) 21:54, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * For setting Daily Value, the highest RDA not counting pregnancy or lactation. Hence, the table is correct that the RDA for 19-50 is 1000 mg/d but the DV is 1300 mg/d because that is the RDA for teenagers. Another example, the iron RDA for men is 8 mg but because the RDA for women who are pre-menopause is 18 mg. the DV is 18 mg. David notMD (talk) 01:25, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Added health claims content
Added more detail on what approved and what not. David notMD (talk) 10:27, 9 July 2018 (UTC)