Talk:Caldecott Honor

Removed Categories?
So why did this get removed from the Children's Lit category, and is not in the Picture book category? ~ender 2008-11-18 5:10:AM MST —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.240.12.80 (talk)

Merge
I propose moving this material to the Caldecott Medal page, primarily to make this page more parallel with the Newbery page but also because I think that has become the general standard on most award pages. -ErinHowarth (talk) 07:54, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Agree --LegitimateAndEvenCompelling (talk) 12:44, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Disagree. The Caldecott Honor page is a big mess of red links. The Caldecott Medal page is concise and useful. There is no harm in keeping them apart. They link to each other clearly. --Knulclunk (talk) 05:30, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The sortable table with the yellow colored cells for winners is inspired. I withdraw my disagreement.--Knulclunk (talk) 14:26, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The Honor page is no longer "a big mess of red links." Do you still oppose the merger? --ErinHowarth (talk) 06:26, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Disagree. Just because the "norm" is to put them on one page, it is very helpful to have a page with JUST winners... otherwise you have to print out 9 or 10 pages just to get one page of information.
 * It is possible to have it both ways. If the table is sortable, you could put all the winners at the top of the page and just print that page. --ErinHowarth (talk) 06:51, 21 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Agree - to those who have disagreed, you have to see how ErinHowarth has done fantastic work on other pages with these sortable tables. I think once you see that, your objections will dissolve.  Go see if you agree. --LegitimateAndEvenCompelling (talk) 12:58, 21 March 2009 (UTC)