Talk:Caledon Institute of Social Policy

Reversion to Stub
Most of the updates made to this article were by an IP address registered to the Caledon Institute and a couple by a user that appears to be affiliated with the Caledon Institute. Given that all of the information was unsourced (except to the website of the Caledon Institute) and a good chunk of it appeared to be copied directly from that website (raising copyright concerns), I felt the best response was to revert all of those edits back to the article as a stub. The Caledon Institute is notable enough for a Wikipedia page, but there isn't much secondary source information on what it does. Under those circumstances, better to leave it as a stub than to have a lot of advertisement-style information from the subject of the article. Wieno (talk) 15:53, 7 May 2015 (UTC)