Talk:California–Nevada Interstate Maglev

Article link
Business Week article

maglev vs track upgrades
How in the world can maglev be a good alternative to track upgrades if the problem with the track upgrades is that they are too expensive? AFAIK, maglev is even more expensive than building high quality track. Is there a source that can be cited for this claim? JNW2 (talk) 01:20, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

February 2012 update: project seems dead
http://www.pe.com/local-news/transportation-headlines/20120121-southern-california-maglev-gone-but-high-speed-rail-remains.ece

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on California–Nevada Interstate Maglev. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090922213331/http://www.canv-maglev.com/ to http://www.canv-maglev.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:00, 25 January 2018 (UTC)