Talk:California Autism Foundation

Article Seems to Lack Neutrality
Today I went through and cleaned up the article. It had grammatical errors, reference troubles, and contained text that wasn't directly involved with the organization's dealings. After fixing these errors, I read over the article a second time and found that it was definitely flawed in the sense that it had only pointed to two sources, a website describing the organization's tax status, and the organization's website itself. In addition, the article does not appear to meet Wikipedia's Notability Guidelines and contains certain advertising. I marked these issues in the heading. Later, I found that nearly all of my changes were reverted by the original editor of the article. This article needs to be severely improved or deleted.

Johnston.josh (talk) 23:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)


 * the article creator is a single purpose account, and has created a directory of autism resources, which is fine if posted at their website, but not appropriate here. Reversions of reasonable edits, if continued, will result in restrictions for this editor. I will try to look at it and clean up.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:35, 9 October 2013 (UTC)