Talk:California Diamond Jubilee half dollar/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Moisejp (talk · contribs) 04:07, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

I'll be reviewing this article. I'll try to start the review in the next couple of days, thanks. Moisejp (talk) 04:07, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

No disambiguation links. Not totally sure if the external links tool is working, but it doesn't seem to be showing any problems. Moisejp (talk) 17:43, 5 October 2014 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * I have corrected a handful of minor punctuation/grammar issues. Otherwise, the prose is very good and readable.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * All statements are attributed to reliable-looking sources. All of the sources are printed ones, which I do not have access to. However, in good faith, I presume the nominator has accurately used these sources and has not added original research.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * It is broad in its coverage and focused.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * The article is neutral and does not display any biases.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * It is stable. No edit wars.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * There are four images, three of which are public domain, and one is the author's own work. The images are appropriately captioned.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

This is a very nice article that meets the requirements of GA. Congratulations and great work! Moisejp (talk) 15:21, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much.--Wehwalt (talk) 16:16, 6 October 2014 (UTC)