Talk:California State Route 149/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 02:20, 21 January 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

 I will place the article on hold for some minor fixes.  Dough 48  72  02:20, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * In the History, it describes a past construction project in future tense.
 * Done. --Rschen7754 10:14, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * In the route description, is it possible to mention how many lanes SR 149 is and whether or not it is a divided highway?
 * It apparently is a divided highway; can't say much more than that. --Rschen7754 09:11, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Source found for lanes. --Rschen7754 08:12, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * What kind of rural features does it pass? Farms? Woods?
 * Not done; I think the article's specific enough. --Rschen7754 09:11, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * In the route description, indicate the termini are interchanges.
 * Done. --Rschen7754 22:01, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I'm going to need at least a few days. I just noticed that there are some dead links that need to be dealt with. --Rschen7754 22:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, I tried to get the dead links resolved; one remains. Got everything else except for one that I disagree with. --Rschen7754 08:16, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Once the remaining dead links are taken care of I will pass the article.  Dough 48  72  19:59, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hmm, according to the external links too these links are dead but they came up for me. Therefore, I will pass the article.  Dough 48  72  20:01, 29 January 2012 (UTC)