Talk:California State Route 190/Archive 1

History notes
1941 map: proposed road      --NE2 22:48, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

GA Nomination on hold
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

--M ASEM 18:47, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:


 * Links cleaned up. --Rschen7754 (T C) 21:05, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't see which sources need accessed date. You may be referring to the various reports that are published online; these already have an associated publication date. --NE2 01:05, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * All web links need an access date, the date that you actually went to the link. This will be different to the date the document was published.  --Holderca1talk 15:01, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Not really, since those links are simply "convenience links". Caltrans produces a yearly (?) bridge log; this is the July 2007 edition. The purpose of the accessed date is so if the resource changes, we know when it was accessed, but these aren't going to change. --NE2 16:48, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * So then just put today's date for them. --Holderca1talk 00:27, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * It seems to be a MLA style issue - I'd just go ahead and put a date just to have one in the reference. --Rschen7754 (T C) 02:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Or I could remove the link. --NE2 05:34, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Honestly, how difficult is it to type "accessdate=2008-03-07" and copy and paste it to each spot, you are talking 15 seconds of work. --Holderca1talk 16:15, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

I added the accessed dates. --NE2 18:39, 7 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Just an FYI, accessdates should be a standard date format, and they can be "today" as long as the source still exists at that point, it's not when you first looked for it. That way, if the site should disappear, someone may be able to find the article at the Wayback Machine or other source.
 * However, regardless, the issues addressed from the GA hold have been cleared up sufficiently that, congratulations, I promote this to GA. --M ASEM  23:47, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 one external links on California State Route 190. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dot.ca.gov/dist9/planning/docs/tcr_sr190.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080427104154/http://www.nps.gov:80/history/history/online_books/deva/section3a5.htm to http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/deva/section3a5.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721033203/http://traffic-counts.dot.ca.gov/2006all.htm to http://traffic-counts.dot.ca.gov/2006all.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:50, 13 November 2016 (UTC)