Talk:California State Route 244/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 23:42, 26 March 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

 I will put the article on hold for fixes to be made.  Dough 48  72  23:42, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * There should not be bolding in the history section.
 * "(That part of I-80 was Interstate 880 until 1981.)" should not be in parentheses.
 * Both done. --Rschen7754 03:26, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Reference 1 is a SPS and should be replaced.
 * Done. --Rschen7754 02:09, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Citation needed for "(That part of I-80 was Interstate 880 until 1981.)"
 * Done. --Rschen7754 04:07, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * References 1 and 2 need publishers and accessdates and references 5, 6, and 7 need accessdates.
 * Done except for reference 1. --Rschen7754 03:36, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Reference 4 is a dead link.
 * Link removed. --Rschen7754 05:02, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Can Legislative Route 288 be mentioned in the lead and bolded?
 * Done. --Rschen7754 03:48, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Can some details about the physical surroundings be added to the route description?
 * Not done, and will not be done. --Rschen7754 03:43, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
 * When was SR 244 built? This is not clearly mentioned in the history.
 * That's what the bridge dates are for... --Rschen7754 02:53, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I would suggest rewording "The bridges along the route date from 1971, a year after the bridges on I-80 to the west" to "SR 244 was built in 1971, a year after the portion of I-80 to the west.  Dough 48  72  03:13, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Still no; that misrepresents the source. Theoretically, the bridges could have been built in a different year. It may be impossible to determine when exactly the road was built; the bridge dates are our best bet. --Rschen7754 03:17, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
 * You do not have a reliable source showing when the actual road was built?  Dough 48  72  03:28, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Would maps be any more accurate? --Rschen7754 03:32, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Maps from the time period would work.  Dough 48  72  03:36, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I'll try to get to the rest of this as quickly as I can, but unfortunately the quarter has started again; it may take longer than 7 days. --Rschen7754 06:16, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Take your time, I will continue to hold the article.  Dough 48  72  15:40, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Everything should be good to go. I apologize about the SPS; I should have caught that before nom'ing. --Rschen7754 04:07, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I will now pass the article.  Dough 48  72  04:08, 9 April 2012 (UTC)